I’ve noticed as I surf the internet for chatter to study that I have come across a few people who express confusion about 352 and all the imagery, the gang culture, the Masonry, and Buddhism that is often associated with 352 in some way… so I thought I’d explain a few things.
I don’t seem to see anything confusing at all about 352, especially when I look at it from the inner fundamentals first and the outer forms last. It only is confusing to an outsider because as they look at 352, they only see outer forms we use and not the inner essence of the ONA/352.
Such as the imagery we decorate our WordPress with… all the materialistic gold and diamonds. It’s been pointed out by at least one random crippled outsider that such blatant materialistic imagery goes totally against the non-materialistic nature of Myatt.
Which is prolly true, but so what? The real question is what exactly does Myatt have to do with the ONA? David Myatt has and still does deny that he has anything to do with an ONA. In fact he challenges anybody to prove it… and nobody has ever been able to prove that Myatt has anything to do with the ONA, beside offering up the over used and jaded conjectures, extrapolations, and speculations.
What these people just can’t stand is that they can’t keep Myatt still or can’t force him into a single box so that they can point their finger at him and attack the box they want him into to make themselves feel better or smarter or safer. So there is always a inner motive or deep inner need in these people to make and force Myatt into Anton Long. I don’t care really who these two people are. Even if they didn’t exist at all, the ONA would still exist thru me and my associates, so attacking Myatt and Long is really pointless.
One thing we should take into consideration and think about is Myatt’s gender and cultural background in regards to materialism and our use of imagery. Myatt is a first a man. Usually… unless you are gay… men don’t really care for jewelry, gold, diamonds, and sparkly accessories. He also is a product of Occidental English Culture, which when compared to oriental culture is not as into gold, jewelry and diamonds.
On the other hand this WordPress is run by two girls, and 352 is dominated by females. Most of the girls that dominate 352 spiritually, philosophically, intellectually, physically, and culturally are of Asian and Mexican ancestry. Girls like jewelry, gold, and diamonds. At least I do… and for me, its just a matter of personal style and taste. For somebody like Chloe on the other hand, it’s fundamentally her culture.
In her (Chloe’s) Culture jewelry, gold, and diamonds are used in two different ways. The first way is as a means of financial security and investment. It’s like how poor people keep their money in a bank which collects interest… about 2 pennies a year. Except when you invest or translate your monetary wealth into gold (and even diamonds) you can generate higher yields from your initial investment if you know what you are doing.
The old people in Chloe’s family/clan came from a country that was politically unstable, and banks were not trusted. So these old people in her family often translate their moneys into gold. Most of this gold would be gold bars or bricks; but also the gold came in the form of wearable jewelry which became for them a sign of status… and we’re not talking about a simple necklace either. I’m talking about a thick gold chain with a big diamond on a 24 carat gold ounce pendant. When gold prices goes up, you they sell the gold… and when gold prices falls, they go out and horde a mass of gold.
Only poor people keep all their monetary wealth inside some bank. So, it is expected that a poor person seeing all this gold and diamond décor become confused about such use of materialistic imagery. Rich people diversify their money’s options and keeping your money inside a bank is more than likely… for any wealthy family… a last option.
The other Cultural use of gold and jewelry in Chloe’s social class’ Culture is that it is a religious belief of theirs that a mother (or parents) who does not share her wealth with her children is a despicable and barbaric mother. So in her Culture or social class, if you were walking around in public without jewelry on, other people will judge your mother as being a selfish and uncultured barbarian. So each mother in Chloe’s social class has a cultural duty of making sure that each of their daughters has at the least a gold and diamond necklace, two bracelets, a few diamond rings, and gold and diamond ear rings.
Having gold and jewelry on for Chloe and her family’s social strata is comparable to having the right wardrobe and accent in England as an example; so that from such markers of social status… one’s manners, accent, clothing, and jewelry… other people can tell what kind of family you come from and where in the social strata your family comes from. A girl without gold and jewelry to Chloe’s family jeopardizes her mother and family’s reputation and name. As a corollary – a girl who is not spoiled makes her mother and family look like selfish barbarians; because in her Culture, their older folks live and work for the younger generation. Whereas in the dysfunctional society of Homo Hubris it’s every generation for themselves.
Wealth and Materialism in 352
Put your foot where your mouth is and show me what you can do with yourself in Life. It should be a well known fact that people talk a lot of shit in life, but when it comes to showing their worth, they don’t got shit to show for it. Talk is cheap as they say. Especially on the internet when any dumb ass can express their opinions, ideas, and cheap thoughts… thoughts and ideas that aren’t even originally theirs, because they usually get it from others.
The above paragraph won’t make any since to outsiders unless they are familiar with the ONA term “WYRD,” and the ONA’s concept of Causal phenomena. I believe Jesus captured the essence of Causal phenomena or Wyrd best in these words – “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?
It’s very easy to believe. It’s even easier to repeat what you have been told to seem intelligent. For, if the person you are quoting was intelligent… no matter how stupid you are, you will sound intelligent. Words are easy to speak in life. With a little effort words can be spinned to make a nobody appear as a religious prophet or political savant.
What is hard in Life is making Life work for you such that Life bares Fruit… and it is by such Fruit born from such Mastery of Life, that is to be valued and judged. Genuine Wealth is not found in a man’s words but in what his deeds and actions have manifested.
I’m not just talking about gold and diamond wealth. I mean genuine numinous Wealth. Do you have a group of companions in Life who will live and die for you like I do? That is genuine Wealth.
You can talk a lot of shit, and vomit your opinions and world views and even make websites… but how far and wide is your influence? How many admires and followers willingly associate themselves with you? That’s genuine Wealth. The Wealth of a Master of Life who knows how to make Life work and bare Fruit for them.
You can write a lot of books and flood the internet with crap like Blackwood and these hundreds of hopeful High Priests… but what about the crap you are regurgitating is creative and original that I cannot find in a book somewhere? That’s poverty… intellectual poverty.
Just like a poor guy with no cash, you have to borrow intellectual capital from other people. You are mentally and intellectually in debt to others. Just like a financially poor person, you will never learn to make your own money (ideas, thoughts, memes). You will continue to borrow other people’s hard earned ideas, thoughts, and memes to make your own opinions and convictions. That is genuine poverty.
It is this same inner ethos – mentality of poverty – that makes you a poor person in real Life too. As you must go to others to borrow their ideas, so will you go to others – banks – to borrow their money. Just as you do not have it in your nature to think for yourself to come up with your own original and creative beliefs, insights, and thoughts, so to will you never learn to make your own money.
Therefore, how you are in Life… what thoughts your mind houses, and what stuff your home houses tells me what kind of person you are… and althoe you can talk and lie and pretend in word to be something great and wonderful… the Fruit of your actions and ethos in Life cannot lie.
Think about it for a moment. Thought and Action arises from the same fundamental Ethos (or rather – Physis… Dharma… Inner Nature) inside a person. Such that if a person lacks the Ethos to generate, create, engineer for himself his own beliefs, thoughts, ideas, that he would have to borrow other people’s intellectual capital… then that same Ethos express in his Actions will generate the same inability such that this person must borrow other people’s money… will always be in debt to others… and thus – just as he is spiritually and intellectually poor – he will likewise be financially poor in Life.
If a person is raised by an average nuclear family… goes to an average school… learns average things… is taught to interpret the world in a basic average way… thinks average thoughts thought up by average people… graduates and does average things like other average people… will this person be Average or above Average?
We are all born into Life genuinely equal – we are all helpless, naked, completely dependent on our parents… we all are born mindless and empty… we all are born into a life with the same sized brain, the same 24 hours in a day, the same 7 day week, the same 365.4 day year… but for some reason some of us end up more smarter and richer than others. Why?
It is because of Ethos – Innate Habit. It is because of the that initial Emptiness we are born with. Most of us – the Average Ones – have the Ethos of borrowing other people stuff to fill in that Emptiness. Some don’t borrow. Instead they work hard on making up their own ideas to fill their natural Emptiness. This later method is called genius… creativity… originality.
It is from this same exact inner Ethos of Creativity – Inner Creative Impulse – that financial and material wealth is born. It is because Colt was creative enough to come up with his own idea of a 6 revolver that made him financially wealthy. It is from this same Ethos of Inner Genius that Ford, and Edison respectively innovated or created the first car and electric light bulb.
It is only reasonable that if you are average and have the average Ethos of taking and borrowing other people’s ideas that you will never have an original and Valuable idea. Valuable here meaning that such is Worth something to others. There is no intelligence or genius in borrowing other people’s thoughts, opinions, or ideas.
Your wealth in Life – the Fruit of your effort – is your worth and measure. Have-nots in Life will distract and misdirect people’s attention away from their inner and outer poverty by flooding their minds and spewing into yours other people’s thoughts and idea and causing a commotion such as debates and arguments or attacking your person… anything to divert your attention from the fact that they are average people mired in intellectual and financial debt.
Show me the money. Show me what you got. Being Wealthy doesn’t always mean having a Rolex. Show me how far and wide your average borrowed thoughts inspires and influences. Show me how many people willingly desire to associate with you as a friend or followers. Show me how many people admire, adore, venerate, and look up to you even when you tell them not to. Show me how many companions in Life you have who will risk their freedom and life for you. These things are aspects of genuine wealth… Causal Fruit of a Wealthy Mind and Rich Ethos.
From influence, the ability to inspire, the ability to attract people’s admiration, respect, attention, affection, honor, loyalty, veneration, comes Social Status and Power. The Power to cause people to Live, Labor, Fight, and Die for you. People naturally uplift you in a respectful position. How many Soliders fought and died for Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, and George Washington? How many people in the past have wage wars and killed for Moses, Jesus, Buddha, and Muhammed? How many people work for Ford in the old days to get his cars? How many people voted for Obama? That’s true Wealth. How many people fight for you? How many people have you inspired? How many people work for you? Who would vote for you. From that Rich Ethos and Inner Genius comes the ability to make your own money… start up your own enterprises… build up your own financial wealthy… and from that Wealth also comes Social Status.
Genuine Wealth is the Wyrdful Creativity of knowing how Causal reality works such that you are able to materialize everything you want and need out of Life. Genuine Poverty is the constant need for others to give you their thoughts and money because you are too stupid to generate your own. Material possessions, friends, money, influence… these things are all merely Causal RESULTS of an Inner Wealthy Ethos. Intellectual unoriginality, and financial poverty are a direct by-product of a poor inner average ethos.
Thus, if picture of gold, jewelry, diamonds, and Mercedes confuses you for some strange reason… then you know which camp you belong to. Like I said – you can pretend and lie in words and especially on the internet about how great, intelligent, and all knowing you are and other average people might buy your shit… but the Fruits of your Life don’t lie or betray your Inner Nature.
So even if Myatt is not materialistic… even if he is not a millionaire… he is still Wealthy in many ways. He still has more in mind, and influence, and followers, then you have. He is still more creative, original, and inspiring then most of you. All you people really have to work with to shake at him is your disagreements; your fantasies and misconceptions of him.
Gang Culture in 352
How many people do you got in your life that will take a bullet for you? How many people in your life do you got that will carry guns on their body to protect you? How many people do you got in your life that will kill for you? How many people do you got in your life that will slang dope and rob people to share their money with you? How many people do you have in your life that sever their loyalty for their State to be Loyal to you for the rest of their lives? I got a whole gang of people like this. Show me what you got… how deep you rolling? I’m taken care of in every way by others for the rest of my Life… who cares about your ass in Life?
You think your better then a gangbanger because you are independent? Because you’re a corporate slave? Because you’re college educated? Because you are law abiding? Because your own blood family won’t even lend you rent money? Because you can parrot verbatim the Bible, or LaVey? What kind of knowledge and power do you have when you can’t even get people to kill and die for you?
It’s the same intense Human emotion called religious fanaticism which drives a Muslim to blow himself up for his group identity and perceived people/tribe. It’s the same Human emotion called Nationalism, and Patriotism that drives an army of young men to risk their lives in jungles and deserts to kill and be killed for their group identity. That’s influence and power. It’s the same Human emotion that drives tribal warriors and head hunters to kill and be killed in tribal wars. Calling it a “gang” doesn’t change what it essentially is. Words obscures the essence.
It is essentially about a group of people who have chosen to be comrade and companions in Life until death. Of a group culture, élan, and identity, which burns fierce with “tribalism,” “nationalism,” “patriotism,” “fanaticism,” or whatever you want to call it which will make it sound safer to you. This thing is essentially about a group of people who live and die for nobody but each other, regardless of the belief system, opinions, thoughts, skin color, sexuality, gender, or whatever. It’s simple… it’s primal. The ONA calls it Sinister Tribes.
Freemasonry in 352
When outsiders, Cowans, and the uninitiated hear the word “Freemasonry,” they think of things like the illuminati, the New World Order, Jews, and Reptiles. When a person stands before Freemasonry Pro-Fanum (outside the Temple), no matter what they speculate and assume of Freemasonry and what goes inside its closed temples is not what actually Freemasonry is about… simply because they are outside and uninitiated.
All it actually takes is for you to find a tangible dictionary (in the form of a real paper based book, not the internet) and look up the word “Freemasonry” to see exactly how masonry fits into the cosmology of 352. Since your average internet generation person is mentally and intellectually lazy, I will quote the basic dictionary definition of the word here – “1. the system and institution of Freemasons. 2. sympathy and mutual help between people of similar interests.” – Oxford American Dictionary. 352 is associated with BOTH definitions of the word. You can’t have a working and functioning tribe of any kind if the members don’t mutual help each other can you?
The belief that Freemasonry is Jewish is one born out of ignorance. Freemasonry is indeed based on a MYTHOS which is found in an ordinary bible. When I say Freemasonry here I mean Freemasonry Proper which consists only of the Blue Degrees of Entered Apprentice; Fellowcraft; and Master Mason… and sometimes the Holy Royal Arch according to its Constitution and ancient self definition.
Just because something is found in the Torah or Old Testament doesn’t mean it is Jewish. We all know Jews are thieves. They stole their ancient land from the Canaanites. They stole their current land from the Palestinians. They stole their ancient gods from the Canaanites. They stole their mythos from more ancient cultures. We all know the myth of Adam and Eve found in the bible is a Jew-stolen version of older myths from Ur, Sumer, and Mesopotamia. We all know the ridiculous story of Noah and the flood was told better in Mesopotamia’s Epic of Gilgamesh. Just because Jews steel other culture’s myths and stories, do not make what has been stolen Jewish. Palestine still rightfully belongs to the Palestinian People.
There is no archeological evidence that a “king David,” or “king Solomon,” or a “Solomon’s Temple” ever existed anywhere in Palestine… but in Kashmir if there is a ruins of a temple the locals of the area say is the ruins of king Solomon’s Temple… and there are ancient legends of a Temple once built on a Mountain of God which was locate far north which is relevant to the mythos of Freemasonry.
The three degrees that makes up what Freemasonry is are centered around King Solomon and the building of Solomon’s Temple.
The Mythos goes that one day Solomon wanted to build a Temple. His friend Hiram King of Tyre supplied Solomon the material, and the King of Tyre sent unto Solomon a skilled Craftsman named Hiram Abiff as the Temple’s Architect.
At some point when the Temple was almost completed, three ruffians came up to Hiram Abiff to force Abiff to tell them the secrets of a Master Mason. Abiff refuses and the ruffians kill him… the Temple is then left Unfinished.
This story seems exoterically to be taken right out of the Bible, and thus we assume that it is Jewish… with the King Solomon and all. But the Temple in the Bible was finished… destroyed and rebuilt a total of 3 times. If the story of Solomon’s Temple in Freemasonry is based on old Jewish stories, then why is their Temple left Unfinished?
Most people assume that Solomon’s Temple is found somewhere in Palestine, because the Jews named a random mountain outside of Jerusalem mount Zion… and the bible says the Temple was on a mount Zion. If you were to read your bibles with an open mind, you’d figure out that that there are actually 2 mount Zions…
“A Song; a Psalm of the sons of Korah. Great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised, In the city of our God, His holy mountain. Beautiful in elevation, the joy of the whole earth, Is Mount Zion in the far north…” – Psalms 48:1-2
The initiate in the first degree of Freemasonry is brought to the North Side of the Lodge and told something strange. He is told that the North Side of Solomon’s Temple is perpetually dark because the Temple was located “so far north of the ecliptic” that the sun never shown on it. Any mountain in Palestine can’t fit this strange definition, because Palestine itself is located very near the equator.
So in a Lodge there are two side associated with Light – the East where the Sun Rises, and the South (of all places) where the Sun is said to be at Meridian Height. The North Side, where the Sun never shines, and the West side where the Sun sets are dark. Such that Half of the Lodge is dark and Half is lit by the Sun. The passage of the Sun in Masonic mythos is backwards or strange – going from east, to south, to west… and never rising north.
The North Pole (far north) is a place which fits this description. Half of the year it is dark, while the other Half it is daylight. The Sun in this region moves from east, to south, to west, and never rises up north.
There is also something else peculiar about the Masonic Lodge which hints at this “far north” location. The Lodge is opened with the Procession of Officers, where the 7 Officers of a Lodge walk in a full circle around the Altar to be invested with the Jewel of their office. This recalls to mind stars revolving around a stationary Pole Star which is the Alter at the very center of the Lodge.
Seated around this Altar are the three main officers: Master, Senior, and Junior Wardens. Each officer has a Jewel displaying a Masonic tool – a Square for the Master… a Level for the Senior Warden… and a Plumb for the Junior Warden. Each of these Jewels is shaped similar to one of three major constellations which revolves closest to the Pole Star – the Master’s Square looks like Ursa… his companion the Senior Warden’s Level looks like Canis… and if you image google a Plumb (if you don’t know what one looks like) you will see that Draco is actually a Plumb in the sky.
There is an un-Jewish ancient tradition which does in fact place a mountain of God in the North Pole – Mount Meru (Sumeru); which is the Holy Mountain of Shiva is said to be at the center of the North Pole below the Pole Star.
There is in fact a sort of etymological connection between mount “Zion” and mount “Meru.” Meru is said to have three peaks, and in certain myths the name of one of those peaks closely associated with Shiva is mount “Nysa.” In Sanskrit Nysa is spelled with only three letters – NIS. When the Jews borrow words from foreign languages, sometimes they render the words “backwards,” or actually they leave the letter order of the word as is. Remember Jews read backwards from right to left. An example of this is the ancient Egyptian word “KLM” (Klom/Kalom/Kalim) which means a “Crown,” in Hebrew it would be read/spelled as Mem-Lemed-Kaph or “Melek” meaning a “King,” or “Prince.” If we think backwards like a Jew and we borrow the name/word NIS, we’d read and spell is thus – Shin-Yod-Nun or Tsadi-Yod-Nun, or Zain-Yod-Nun; which would render Sion or Tzion or Zion (the “O” between the Yod and Nun being the inherent vowel in YOd/YUd).
Hiram Abiff is also not a real figure to be found in the Bible. Names and words must be mutated and letters changed to force a Hiram Abiff (Khurum Abi in the bible) to be seen in the Bible. If Masonry’s Mythos is based on the Bible, then why is their central hero not even in the bible?
The very word “Hiram” is not a Jewish word. It is found as it looks – HIRAM – in Sanskrit and is used as an honorific title.
“Solomon” was not the name of the King of Israel assumed to be the same person. In the bible his name is King Jedadiah. Solomon is a corruption of the Phoenician/Tyrian “Salamana,” or “Shalaman,” or actually just “ShLMN” which is a variation of the Canaanite God “Shalim,” or rather “ShLM” since these people did not use vowels. Why would a Jewish king be named after a Phoenician God?
If you do a little elementary google research you will learn that Shalim is the God of the Dusk or Morning. Specifically Shalim was the planet Venus in the West in the Evening… which was called the Evening Star. Shalim had a Twin brother named “Shachar” or “Shahar,” or actually “ShKhR.”
Shahar – whose name appears in the bible in the original Hebrew – is the Cannanite God of the Dawn, which was associated with Venus in the East… called the Morning Star. The word “ShKhR” is related to the word/name Shukar, or Sukar, or Sukr which are variants of the Sanskrit name and word for the Planet Venus.
In ancient Rome, this same planet – the Morning Star – was referred to as “Luciferi” meaning the light bringer… If Solomon is Shalim – the Evening Star – then who do you think Hiram the King of Tyre is?
“12 “Son of man, take up a lament concerning the King of Tyre and say to him: ‘This is what the Sovereign LORD says: ” ‘You were the model of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. 13 You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone adorned you: ruby, topaz and emerald, chrysolite, onyx and jasper, sapphire, turquoise and beryl. Your settings and mountings were made of gold; on the day you were created they were prepared. 14 You were anointed as a guardian cherub, for so I ordained you. You were on the holy mount of God; you walked among the fiery stones.15 You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created till wickedness was found in you.16 Through your widespread trade you were filled with violence, and you sinned. So I drove you in disgrace from the mount of God, and I expelled you, O guardian cherub, from among the fiery stones.17 Your heart became proud on account of your beauty, and you corrupted your wisdom because of your splendor. So I threw you to the earth…” – Ezekiel 12-17
“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [how] art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.” – Isaiah 14:12-17. The word “Lucifer” in that passage in the Hebrew is “ben Shahar,” which is the Morning Star.
What are the chances that both Solomon/SHLM and the King of Tyre/Shahar are both associated with Venus which in Latin is often referred to as Lucifer? What kind of a mortal King of Tyre was Hiram if he was present in the Garden of Eden… if he was a “Guardian Cherub,” as the passage in the bible describes him?
If the mythos of the Unfinished Temple and the death of Hiram Abiff is Jewish, then why do the ancient Egyptians actually have a story concerning a Pharaoh who desired to build a temple, whose friend supplied him with material, and whose Master Architect was actually named Hurum Abif who was murdered and thus rendering the great temple unfinished?
The actually exoteric mythos of Freemasonry is insignificant to 352, because the esoterica beneath it is the same in essence as the esoterica of a mythos of the ONA. The outer forms might be different, but the essence is the same.
In Freemasonry the Temple is left Unfinished for a reason, and Hiram is murdered for a reason. The Initiate in the Third Degree plays the part of Hiram, and is “raised from the grave.” The Initiate symbolically becomes Hiram Abiff the Architect of the Temple. The Temple itself symbolizes the World – Lodge being related to the Sanskrit word Loga/Loka meaning World. The square shape (Quadrilateral) of the Lodge/Temple in ancient Egypt and Chinese actually represents the Earth/world.
The Temple/world being Unfinished represents that the state of things on Earth… as much of a wonderful and beautiful Living Temple that it is… is NOT finished. The Initiate as the Temple/World’s Architect must endeavor to act like an Architect in life to do what he can to build the world into a better one… or to evolve the civilizations and human species into better forms.
This is the same essential esoterica in one of the ONA’s mythos. The Dark Gods came long ago to this earth… something happened and they are gone. ONA initiates work to open star gates and nexions to bring them back and to fill the earth with Acausal energy to destroy the old world to manifest a new world – a galactic civilization. Different outer Mythos… same inner Esoterica… same Work and Agenda. What is so confusing?
The mythos of Freemasonry itself is insignificant to 352. What aspect of Freemasonry 352 uses is Freemasonry’s degree/initiation structure and concept. Each grade/degree has an Oath which the Initiate takes. Each Oath binds the Initiate to his fellows in mutual aid and loyalty. The Initiate Degrees creates a Culture in which the members are bound to each other by oaths of Loyalty… does this seem familiar at all?
Does it not remind you of the 7 degrees/grades of the ONA’s Seven Fold Way? What about the Oaths an Initiate takes during their Initiation rituals? What about the ONA Law of the Sinister-Numen which binds each Initiate into a Tribe/Order of Initiates bound to each other in the spirit and ethos of mutual aid and Loyalty? Is this all confusing? Are you so mentally retarded that that you don’t see the redundancy… the similarity… the fucking sameness?! If 352 is weird and a bastard form of the ONA because we use “Masonic/Magian” stuff… then the ONA is Jew or Magian too.
The fact is, if you would just get your head out of your asses, is that people of every culture and ethnicity and skin color and time and place have been using this initiation by degree structure with oaths or loyalty forever long before and after the Jews. It’s so old and everywhere it’s just human.
Pick any indigenous Tribal culture in the world from Africa to Papua New Guinea, to the ancient American Indians, to the Amerindians of South America, and you will see this same exact shit. It’s called in anthropological lingo – “the men’s house,” and “rites of passage.” It usually a big fucking long house where elders of the tribe smoke their peace pipes together… make young boys do weird things to prove their manhood… then give them an initiation ceremony and teach them the mythos and culture of the Tribe and make them take an Oath of loyalty to the fucking tribe. What is so Magian and Jewish about this? It seriously bugs me when people are so culturally myopic that they don’t know shit about other cultures and people outside what their bible, Satanic Bible, and high school history class tells them. Please people… do us and yourself a favor and seek adult education… put the Occult shit down and go to fucking college.
Buddhism and 352
Buddhists being in the ONA also causes confusion in many dumb people, and we have encountered such plenty of times. Outsiders to the ONA, and even insiders who can’t see the essence beneath the form can’t see how ethnic Buddhists can be Nazi-Satanist at the same time. The cause of this confusion is that they neither understand the ONA or Buddhism.
Anyone that thinks they know what Buddhism is because they read Wikipedia and a book by the Dali Lama is an idiot. I can only speak about Theravada Buddhism since I study it and live it with my associates in 352 who are all Theravadins by birth.
Theravada Buddhism is the oldest form of Buddhism, which is the closest to the original form. The authoritative “text” or “holy book” of Theravada is the teachings of Buddha and his Disciples called the “Tipitikas.” If you would like to read and study the Tipitikas, you never will because it actually is composed of 24,000 pages… about 15-20 volumes, and most of the books are still in its original Pali. You would have to learn the Pali language, then sit your ass down for several years to read all 24,000 pages… and even then you would only apprehend half of what Living Cultural Buddhism is.
Unlike other religions, because the Tipitikas are so long and because nobody has ever read all the texts, Theravada Buddhism has virtually become a “bookless” Way of Life. By “Way of Life,” I literally mean a very real cultural Way of Life. The line between Buddhism, Culture, and Indigenous Traditions blurs in Theravada Buddhism’s native countries such as Cambodia, Thailand, Laos, and Burma. By the word “native” I mean to denote that Buddhism has been living in such peoples, cultures, and regions for at least since the year 300BC according to documentation, as Emporer Ashoka of the Mayuran Empire; who was India’s greatest and bloodiest warlords and Buddhism’s instrumental Father or “midwife” (ironic huh?); sent missionaries into Southeast Asia to make converts of the Khmer in the area around that year (300bc). That’s 300 years before Jesus was born… 600 years before Christianity was codified at the Nicene Council in the Roman Empire.
Theravada Buddhism – per the Buddha – rejects the concept of a God or Creator, as such a belief in creators and gods leads to suffering and samsara (rebirth). Theravada Buddhism – as per the Buddha – also rejected the authority and power of Hinduism’s priests at the time – the Brahmans. Theravada Buddhism also; again as per Buddha’s direct teachings; rejects the sanctity and use of temples of worship, rites, and rituals… which was the central aspect of Hinduism, as the Brahmans taught that performing puja (worship and offerings) at the temples was crucial to making good karma and escaping long cycles of rebirth. The Buddha once even said that the Hindu gods make terrible role models because they have human emotions and feelings and commit questionable deeds like people.
Not only did Buddhism openly reject and go against the power and religious authority of that time (Brahmanism, which is a form of olden day Hinduism) but whoever formulated Buddhism even chose the devil of Hinduism as their cult hero – Shiva. Ancient statues and cave drawing of Shiva as Mahayogi thousands of years older than Buddhism, are identical to statutes and the familiar form of the Buddha – orange saffron robe… knotted hair… lotus position… seated on a lotus even… in a meditative state.
So the picture being painted here of Buddhism contextual matrix is that Brahmanism was the supreme power of India, and along comes a group of rebels of some sort who got tired of Brahman rule and they picked Shiva, Hinduism’s Devil who is known for burning man made illusions with his third eye, as their new religion’s mascot. The word “Buddha” isn’t even original. Shiva was called the Enlightened One (Buddha) because of his meditation long before the Buddha. Nirvana isn’t original, is was and still is known at times in Shaivism and other Hindu sects as mahanirvana.
The era Buddhism was created was circa 500BC which was a time when India was going thru its “Age of Enlightenment,” almost like how England (and Europe) went thru their Age of Enlightenment during the 17th century. Like the European Enlightenment, the Indian Enlightenment called out freethinkers who were all pretty tired of Brahmanism. These freethinkers began to question religious doctrine, and from their questioning and philosophizing new religions and philosophies were born such as Jainism and Buddhism in India… and China was also effected. This was also the time when philosophical giants like Lao Tzu of Taoism, Confucius, and Mencius were around teaching their new philosophies.
This atmosphere of liberation of thought from a tyrannical religion is very similar to Christianity’s religious tyranny of over Europe isn’t it? Not only did Christianity’s tyranny spawn a European Age of Enlightenment, but 200 and something years later it spawned reactionary religions… such as groups of people picking Satan or Lucifer out of Christianity’s mythos as their cult hero… Lucifer of course means LIGHT Bringer, while Buddha means the EnLIGHTened.
Buddhism was thus in its early beginnings an intellectual, philosophical, and spiritual reaction to Hinduism’s (Brahmanism) religious control and tyranny. Which is why you find that Buddhism rejects and teaches against every traditional component of Hinduism – its gods, its temples, its priests, its rites, its rituals, and its Vedas. So in a way we can say that Buddhism is to Hinduism, what Satanism is to Christianity. This statement is not 100% true, but it expresses the similarity. They also share another similarity. Both Buddhism and Satanism referred to their anti-counterparts as “Right Hand Paths.” Satanism differentiated itself by referring to itself as “Left Hand Path,” while Buddhism refers to itself as “the Middle Path.” So you can see that there is the same essential thought-process taking place where Buddhism and Satanism are attempting to distance themselves from their counterparts by diverging “Paths.” Of course then there is the iconic use of the Devil of Hinduism and Christianity in Buddhism and Satanism respectively which is another similarity in thought-process.
If you study Satanism in contemporary subculture attentively you will also begin to see another growing similarity between Buddhism and Satanism. This growing similarity is happening in Satanism collectively which is noticeable across Satanism’s three oldest Branches: CoS; TOS; and ONA.
During the early years when Satanism’s three oldest branches were solidifying a lot of focus was placed on mythos, reactionary thinking, and reactionary rites such as Black Masses. Today, we notice that reactionary rites and magic are faded out while the memeplex of all three branches are becoming increasingly more philosophical and enlightenment oriented; especially the ONA. Carnal indulgence is no longer the central focus of all three branches of Satanism. Most, if not all three branches either via Anton Long and Aquino or thru LaVey’s Modern adherents themselves are more focuses on self enlightenment and self betterment… which is the central focus of Buddhism – Samasambbuddhi – Self Enlightenment.
The Three Jewels of Buddhism are also significant to 352. The Triple Gems are – Buddha (Buddham saranam gacchami); Dhamma (Dhamman saranam gacchami); and Sangha (Sangham saranam gacchami).
Dhamma is the Pali form of the Sanskrit Dharma. In ancient times Dharma denoted “Nature” or a “Natural Way” of things which were seen as “doctrines” that governs Nature and natural beings. Hinduism gradually perverted the word to mean a religious doctrine (of their religion). Buddhism took it to mean something idiomatically in between a Natural Way of Nature, and the Buddha’s Teachings. This word has a similar essence to a word the ONA uses – Physis.
So it’s not confusing for a Theravada Buddhism who understands Dhamma to see something familiar in the ONA’s Physis. It’s also not hard for a Theravada Buddhism who understand the Buddha’s teachings of Karma and Causality, to see something familiar with the ONA’s teachings of Wyrd and Causality.
Sangha in Theravada Buddhism actually refers to two things – the Bhikkhu-Sangha and the Ariya-Sangha. The word “Sangha” means a “Community,” or “Order,” or “Association.” The Bhikkhu-Sangha is the ascetic Order of monks and nuns who study the Buddha’s written teachings, meditates, and imparts the teachings and memeplex of Buddhism in its pristine form to each emerging new generations. The Ariya-Sangha (meaning Noble Order) are the men and women who follow and practice the Buddha’s teachings and take care of each other via the essential teachings of the Buddha’s fundamental teaching – cessation of suffering… to relieve each other’s needs and suffering.
So… its not hard to see that a group of 352ers who live group culture such as gang culture, who see value in Masonic Brotherhood, who values communitarian sisterhood, who already live with each other as an Order of mutual aid and relief to see something similar with the Sangha of Buddhism, the Clans of Reichsfolk and The Numinous Way, and the Sinister Tribes of the ONA. Things are also less confusing when you learn that Buddhism is a religion and personal spiritual philosophy, while the ONA is a methodology and praxis that uses outer forms such as National-Socialism and Satanism.
Conclusion
As you can see… when you actually have the intelligence and take the time to not be so lazy and just do a little research, what seems superficially confusing about 352, actually makes sense and is seamless to its initiates. The only difference being the outer words.
I guess I took the time to address this issue because I do personally like the ONA and to me (as I understand things), the ONA is compatible with all of the above topics I mentioned… but such conclusions can only come if you take the time to let go of what you have heard and read about such named above things and study them yourself with an open mind. Especially Wyrd and Wealth, because if you understand the mechanics of Wyrd and how Cause and Results works in the world, and you are an intelligent ONA initiate who is skilled at manipulation of people and situations, then there is no reason why you should not be wealthy in some way gradually as time passes… and in this day and age, the more wealth a tribe or community or clan has, the less suffering its members will experience.
Kayla 352
Order of Nine Angles
121 yf
