That statue of the Buddha is an ancient Southeast Asian rendering of him with the Naga hooding him. There is a superficial myth as to why a seven headed Dragon ended up “growing” out of his head that’s told, but I am not familar with this myth. Most of the really old men in my family are monks who are more familiar with the esoteric meaning of this. The Dragon is Shakti/Kundalini, as she is raised up the spine she “grows” a new head each time she passes a “chakra” until she blossoms as a 7 headed Dragon at the Crown and gives illumination. But this “Buddha” is not even “Buddha.” He is Shiva as Mahayogi, as we shall see later. I thought I would also include a picture of the Statue of Liberty whose real formal name is: Liberty Enlightening the World. It’s just curious how the Enlightened Liberty has a Crown of 7 Rays as she holds a Torch and Book. This Statue of Liberty was a gift from French Freemasons to American Freemasons. The Quest for Light is a central concept in Freemasonry (in it’s Blue Degrees), and Light is what the word BUDDH actually means.
352 does not believe Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) was ever a real person, and there is a reason why 352 even wastes it’s time trying to understand Buddhism, as we shall see later on. When 352 studies a outside religion, we do it from an anthropological/sociological perspective and we try to understand it within it’s native contextual matrix as possible. We have to go into paleontology and archeology to understand what a “matrix” actually is. When you’re digging for dinosaur fossils in the ground the dirt that surrounds or envelops the fossil or artifact is called the “Matrix.” If you were an archeologist and you found an artifact, the contextual matrix of that artifact is the place and time period it actually came from and anything esle you know about it’s native people, place and time in relation to the artifact. When you take something out of its native contextual matrix you risk asserting or projecting your own modern ideas and opinions about an artifact, therefore “contaminating” it.
So when we study something like Buddhism, we can’t just open a modern book about Buddhism and read about it. We must relocate it back to its native place and time, and consider the political conditions of the time, the nature of the people that were around the time and stuff.
Most Buddhist will say that Buddhism was born circa 500 B.C. during India’s age of enlightenment or it’s renaissance. Buddhism as a codified religion didn’t happen until 250 B.C. when the first and oldest school of Buddhism formed: Theravada Buddhism. If you notice the date of Buddhism’s formal birth you will notice that at least a hundred years had already past since the Greeks (Alexander the Great et al) had conquered parts of India and has established their Hellenistic culture there (mostly in northern and western India). What’s this mean? It means that the thinkers of India had at least a hundred years to familiarize themselves with Greek philosophy.
Ergo, I do not believe that Gautama was ever a real person, because his life’s story and the story of how he became enlightened is too similar to Plato’s Cave Allegory. To recapitulate the Allegory of the Cave: There is a Cave in the middle of a forest, and in that cave lives a tribe of people who has never ventured outside their cave. Every evening, when the sun set this tribe starts seeing weird shadows of treelike things and shadow people dancing on the wall of their cave. The wisemen of this tribe takes those shadows and interprets them into religion and stuff. One day a boy asked what was outside the cave, and the elders said demons and that no one should venture out of the safe cave. The boy sneaks out anyways one day and discovers a whole other world outside his cave made of trees. He sees the sun setting, and sees another tribe of people building a fire and dancing around it and he looks as their shadow is casted into his cave. He is enlightened.
The Buddha’s story is fundamentally the same story. When Gautama’s mother was pregnant with him she and her husband – the king of their kingdom went to the royal astrologer. The royal astrologer said that the boy will have two destinies. If he remains inside the walls of the palace he will one day grow up to become the emperor of the whole world; but if he sees the suffering of people outside the palace, he will become a begger.
Naturally, Gautama’s father wanted Gautama to be a great emperor and warlord, so the king ordered a wall to be built around the palace with all these opulent gardens, and he forbade any old people or sickly looking people from coming near the palace walls. Only healthy, beautiful people were allowed around the palace. So Gautama was raised in an artificial world where he thought all people were healthy, happy, beautiful, and immortal. He got married and had some kids. Then one day the guards were asleep and an old woman with a walking cain comes wandering into the palace to complain to the king about everyone starving to death because of a famine or something. Gautama sees the hag and is afraid at first because he had never seen a human in such condition and believed her to be a demon at first. Anyways, the old lady tells Gautama that all people grow old and die, and so will he, and the King (his father) sees the two of them talking and has a palace gaurd quickly shoot her to death with an arrow.
It was too late. Later out of curiosity, Gautama scales the palace walls dressed in civilian costume and sees Reality for the first time. he sees people growing old, people starving to death, people working day and night to farm the crops and food he ate. He thinks to himself why there should be so much suffering if we are all born to die. So he goes to join different religions and talks to different sages to get answers but none satisfies him. He leaves for the forest where he contemplates and becomes enlightened.
It’s such a wonderfully empathetic story of some guy who learns to care for the lowly, and one would never have guest that this same story was used politically to slaughter millions. 250 B.C was a period in India’s history when emperor Ashoka came to power. Ashoka ended up creating the largest empire ever to exist on the Indian subcontinent, and he used “Buddhism” as his most powerful tool to gain that power and establish his own civilization.
You see, during Ashoka’s time Hinduism was the dominant religion. A religion with millions of gods with these priests called Brahmins, and all of society was divided into castes. Then along comes “Buddhism” which is the total opposite of Hinduism. Buddhism rejects the existence or significance of all gods and rituals. It rejects the Brahmins priestly powers. It rejected the caste system. AND it told the common people during that time exactly what they wanted to here: that life is indeed full of suffering, but there is a way to end it. Not only was “Buddhism” the polar opposite of Hinduism, but the creators of Buddhism even picked Hinduism’s version of “satan” – Shiva as its central figure.
Nothing about the teaching of Buddha actually belongs to him, not even his look or knoted hair. Hundreds of years before Buddha, Shiva as Mahayogi had been depicted as a knoted haired man in an orange robe (color of death in as the Sun turns orange when it sets), seated in a lotus position in meditation. Shaivites rejected the material world as being an evil illusion of maya and saught to end man’s birth and death cycle to merge back with Shiva as the unmanifested force and dissolve their egos. The only thing unique to Buddhism is the early story of how he was enlightened (which turns out to be a retelling of an older Greek story) and the focus on the suffering of people.
With Buddhism emperor Ashoka now had a powerful force to collect the common people under him. This broke their allegiance with their Hindu kings and made Ashoka’s job of conquering all of India much easier. This, we of the ONA, will recognize as “Disruption.” Ashoka used something he helped put together (Buddhism) to totally distrupt and break the coherency of Hindu India to tear it apart and manifest his own civilization. The power of Buddhism, in its contextual matrix, as any potent political doctrine nowadays, is that it emotionally resonated with the plight and condition of the Common Mass, and excited the people’s emotions and passions. Basically Ashoka told the people: “Gosh your life sucks, there’s a way out though, and you guys are special; by the way, those Hindus is a major source of that suffering, lets kill some Hindus.” That’s the basic formula. Take what I just said, and think Hitler, Communism, and the doctrine of Liberty the founding fathers of America were preaching.
Let’s quickly examine “National Socialism” in its contextual matrix. It doesn’t even matter to the common mass what the internal poilitics of the Nazi Party were. Some guy with a weird mustache just came a long and said what the people wanted to hear at the time: “Gosh you’re life suck, look at you pathetic Germans, you guys lost world war one, nobody likes you… fuck them, you guys are special, Aryans or something, by the way, those wealthy Jews are a major cause of your suffering, let’s kill some Jews.”
How about Communism? Lenin and Mao comes a long to their peasents and said: “Man you peasents’ lives suck, we got the answer to your problems, oh and by the way those Bourgeois are the major cause, lets kill some pigs. And it’s the same basic shit with the American revolution, you just substitute the pig/Jew/Hindu with the tyrannic English.
The point being that all of these above examples were empathetic to the emotional insecurities of the common mass and learned to take advantage of that insecurity by offering what sounded like security to harness their collective synergic force to bring power to themselves.
Thus the secret to power is in the people. By themselves the common herd is a hodge podge of incoherent random brute force. In Freemasonry this brute force is symbolized by the Set-Maul (a “hammerlike” instrument). The Set-Maul in the hands of an unthinking, unskilled person is just raw destructive force. Give a stupid incoherent mass set-mauls and place them in the midst of a mountain and if given enough time that mountain would be turned into rubble. But, when the Master Architect applies, or exerts his intelligence onto this same brute mass, by drawing up a blue print of a temple, calling the chaotic mass into order, and tracing lines on the stone and sets them to work, that same mountain in time would end up as a beautifully crafted cathedral. The differences is incoherent, uncollected brute force of a mass, and that same chaotic force brought into coherency under the will of intelligence.
If an institution like the ONA is to distrupt society and establish Imperium, it cannot lose sight of the sheer power of the brute mass. This of course involves a great deal of ability to empathize and understand the mass, rather than reject them. True, they are a stupid breed, but if Nature did not have a place in her order of things for the stupid, would evolution have allowed them to have survived this far? If intelligence were the single aim that nature strove for, for billions of years of mutation and evolution, would all humans be intelligent big brained thinking super organism? We’re not superbrained. 90% of our “fellow” humans have the intelligence of a your common variety windmill. Set one of these fuckers in motions, to work on something, and they’ll do it untill they fall a part.
Nature couldn’t give a shit about “intelligence.” Intelligence doesn’t insure Nature that genes would be passed down. It doesn’t take much intelligence to pick up a rock and kill weak people with it, nor does it require intelligence to be an army of soldiers with spears slaughtering an entire weak nation. This murderous essence of Nature can be seen in every one of Nature’s organisms. The strong live to bare Mother Nature future progeny.
Fuck intelligence and those intellectual bastards. No nation or empire on earth has ever been born from a think tank of nerds. Politics, intellectual philosophy comes second, after a blood thirsty emperor has conquered new territory with his army… after many people, tribes, and nations have been subjugated, enslaves, raped, and ripped into near extinction.
That’s the first objection our WSA has with Buddhism – Compassion. We as a species would have never gotten this far if we were compassionate with our fellow humans. There is no such thing as a fellow human for a predator with absolute power and domination in mind. Annihilation gives birth to coherency. Take America for example during its Western Expansion. Did it have any compassion for the weaker natives? No, they were demonized and sluaghtered into near extinction. In such a state, these natives have not power to break the coherency of the new social order. This gives America a single spirit to progress without impedement. But take the plight of the Jews and Palistinians. Unfortunately the State of Israel came into existence after the Monroe Doctrine had been accepted by the “international community.” Since the Jews couldn’t legally slaughter all of the Palistinians for their land, we have the Hundred Year Headache to deal with. I personally don’t care which party goes, but one of them peoples needs to go extinct so the other can carry on with self progression as a nation. Personally I have no compassion for the weak. If Jews kicked your ass for your land, then you suck hella bad, and you need to commit mass suicide, because where is the dignity in that?
The other objection to Buddhism we have is Buddhism is pessemistic. It teaches that life is full of suffering, and that suffering is born from desire and attachment. Which is just one side of the coin. Life is like a roller coaster – there’s ups and downs to it – which makes the ride as a whole experience fun, because who would pay to ride a ride that just was leveled and went straight like a freeway? That shit’s boring. Don’t just look at the down side and say life sucks.
Interestingly, my objections to the central teachings of the Buddha isn’t “antibuddhism,” because the Buddha actually taught his students to question all things including his teaching and for each of his disciples to work on coming to their own personal enlightenment, to each work on becoming Buddhas. What the Buddha is followed for is not his teachings, which I endorse as they make the brute breed of men more softer and less of a danger to himself and other. What the Buddha is followed for is the Way he founded. The Way to personal Liberation and Enlightenment. This Way was a revolutionary Way, and still is, considering how Hinduism and most organized religions actually puts priests, myths, dogma, moral law, and doctrine all in between you and your own private Liberation and Enlightenment.
Indeed, life is full of suffering says the WSA. But Why asks the common dumbass? Because life is full of idiots. Stupid people do stupid things and because we live in a causal world, if you input stupid action, you get an equal stupid effect. Your misery is your own fault and reward, what has it to do with me? Do I look like a fucking Buddha, like I was put here to educate your ass? The WSA recognizes two main causes of suffering in life. When we learn to isolate the cause of a problem, we can then learn to fix the problem in our own lives. Stupidity is the first cause of human suffering. The second cause of human suffering is what 352 calls “Don’t-give-a-shitery.” Don’t-give-a-shitery is when your neighbor is evicted and you just don’t give a flying fuck because it has nothing to do with you, because if that was you being evicted, he wouldn’t give a shit about you. Thus while half the continent of Africa is starving to death, 1 out of every 4 Americans is a fatass tub of lard behemoth. Don’t-give-a-shitery is the by-product of a highly social organism being forced into individualized-self-reliant units. This causes individualized indifference. Things weren’t always like this when we were tribal.
Fixing stupidity in your own personal life is easy. It just requires thinking and understanding the simple ass law of cause and effect. Don’t-give-a-shitery is harder to fix, because you need to find and establish strongs bonds with those who will give a shit and cherrish them, and return the give-a-shitness. Making those strong bonds of give-a-shitness is the essence of the WSA – controlled, exclusive compassion for those who deserve it in otherwords.
Why should I care about the stupid person next to me? Why should I even enlighten him if he is easier to take advantage of in his stupid condition? I wasn’t put on this earth to enlighten your dumbass, you do that shit yourself, or continue living the miserable life you life because you deserve it. This is one of the major issues we have with other brands of satanism, the occult, and other religions, they have this pointless desire to enlighten the unenlightenable. You can try to teach a hillbily and gorilla how to read and use sign language, but that doesn’t mean either has any commonsense, critical thinking skills, or are rational, or consciously aware that one’s own stupid actions affects your ownself, and most times it affects others around you.
The years ahead aren’t going to get any better and prettier. By 2012 we will officially have 7 billion people living on this earth – in the midst of a gradual decline in the earth’s health. There will be more poor people living on earth without clean water and electricity. The middle class is eroding as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
In this emerging era religion, politics, and race are irrelevant to the common person. The insecurity of the future and one’s personal economic/financial ability to survive is thickening. In such times, having a close intimate group bound to you to depend on will gradually be a matter of survival. If you are sensative and sinister enough to feel the growing insecurity of the common global mass out there, and you know how to tap into that potency…
Chloe
352:O9A
352
