It is right and necessary – Aeonically (as part of our Sinister Dialectic) and personally (for individual development and self-evolution) – that we champion what is genuinely heretical in the societies of our times; what is dangerous for individuals and groups to adhere to, support, and propagate and strive to bring-into-being; what The System, its governments and their law-enforcements agencies, regard as a clear and present danger, as a practical threat to their own State or national security.
Thus, we are not talking nor writing about those of us or associated with us or inspired by our sinister methodology and our desire to Presence The Dark, being poseurs and playing some fantasy game or acting out some rôle in some ritual. We are talking and writing about practical deeds; about a practical transgression of the limits set by the mundanes and their governments. We are talking and writing about aiding, supporting, inciting, and taking part in practical insurrection against The System; about taking up arms; about being real revolutionaries; about deeds which might or which could bring us to the notice of law-enforcement agencies and the “security services” of the countries where we dwell; about deeds which make us enemies of The State, and which are dangerous and which make us real outlaws: deeds which carry the risk of us being killed, injured, or – if caught – being sent to prison for quite some time.
Hence, it is one task of those of us or associated with us or inspired by our sinister methodology and our desire to Presence The Dark to determine what is genuinely heretical in the societies of their times. To determine what they – what the mundanes – fear, and then to use that fear against them. Thus will we exult in what is sinister, and thus will our individuals lives acquire and presence that dark ecstasy that takes us far beyond the level of the mundanes. Thus will we, as individuals, become by our heretical deeds, by being outlaws or revolutionaries, a genuine sorcerer or sorceress of the sinister: someone whose very life is a deed of sorcery and who does not, like the Satanic poseurs of other groups, pretend to be a sorcerer or sorceress, by acting out some rôle in some ritual or who write about dark fantasies in cyberspace or who try to make sinister sorcery into some kind of social networking…
In addition, it is right and necessary – Aeonically (as part of our Sinister Dialectic) and personally (for individual development and self-evolution) – that we also use proxies, or sinister cloaking: that is, that we, from the shadows, manipulate others (often or mostly mundanes – those not of us) to do such things, for sinister cloaking itself is as sinister, and often more so in some circumstances, than the direct personal approach of direct personal exposure and personal risk.
Indeed, once we as individuals have had some necessary experience of such direct personal exposure and personal risk by so aiding, supporting, and inciting genuine heresy, and doing practical heretical deeds, then sinister cloaking becomes the most viable option, unless, that is, the character, the personality, of the individual sorcerer or sorceress inclines them to continue to exult in the risk of such practical deeds. Indeed, there is lot to commend such a continued practical approach, for those whose wyrd is that of the warrior…
Order of Nine Angles
120 Year of Fayen
(Extract from the ONA MS To Champion the Heretical, by Anton Long)
[See also: Heresy, Strategy, and Insight Roles]
